<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>RoboForm &#038; Chrome Topic: Chrome no good without roboform</title>
<link>http://www.roboformchrome.com/</link>
<description>Unofficial forums for RoboForm and Google Chrome.</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:27:48 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>topbananaandrew on "Chrome no good without roboform"</title>
<link>http://www.roboformchrome.com/topic/chrome-no-good-without-roboform#post-141</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 09:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>topbananaandrew</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">141@http://www.roboformchrome.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Some extra speed with Chrome, and I like the stripped down interface.  The lack of addons is probably what helps it to be faster than firefox, where badly integrated addons cause mayhem. However, without roboform I will not be using Google Chrome.Many others feel the same way.  Doesn't work with Billeo either.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

